• Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Simp” used to be a part of AAVE until 4chan and the white gays colonized it

      They do that to a lot of our vernacular these days

        • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          As far as I understand (might be missing nuance, 'cause it was 80s/90s AAVE in the first place) it’s someone who puts the homies aside over chasing a romance, especially if the romantic interest is considered unworthy/‘for the streets’ or if the homies consider what you’re chasing to be unrequited

          Basically a person who marks out for someone who probably doesn’t gaf about them

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

      If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Vernacular doesn’t need to belong to a person or even a group of people.

        Then why do they call it “African American Vernacular English”?

        If your problem is with the people who say it and not the word itself, that’s a different issue and one that I’m not really interested in debating.

        Who says I can’t have two problems?

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Is English your second language? I didn’t say it can’t be associated to a person or group, I said it doesn’t need to.

          I also didn’t say that you can’t have more than one problem, I just addressed the one you seemed to be concerned with and defined it as one that I’m not interested in debating.