• mobius_slip@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Veidt would never consider himself the good guy for what he did, but I think that’s what makes the writing so excellent.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I should re-read it, but the impression I got was that Oz was the epitome of this thread’s topic. A real “ends justify the means” villain, where his end goal is to save the world from itself by giving it a common enemy to vanquish. And he does it. In terms of the classical trolley problem, he pulled the lever to kill 1 instead of doing nothing and allowing 5 to die. Am I misremembering?

        • emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Veidt asked the precognitive being if his plans for utopia would come to be, and if it was all worth it in the end. Osterman cryptically responded by saying “Nothing ever ends”, and teleported away leaving Veidt once again in doubt as to whether or not his plan was successful.

          From what I understood, he spent the whole story acting super-sure about what would happen if he did nothing, and how he alone could fix it. But in the end of the comic, this showed he had doubts. Veidt didnt have precognition, just very good prediction. But also an over-inflated ego. He killed a lot of people for a “maybe”.

    • The_wild_card@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah ozymandies was kind of an ass regardless . Did he solve a big problem ? Yes . Was he a good guy ? Far from it.