• rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d hop to this in a heartbeat. I do enjoy pop os and I’ve been looking for a reason to go back to Fedora since I’ve been on openSUSE for a while.

  • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    This would be awesome. Fedora has really been one of the best distros lately, hopefully they don’t get fucked by Red Hat in the future.

      • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, they only fucked CentOS, and they made RHEL proprietary last year. Since Ubuntu’s decline, Fedora basically took it’s place. It’s very stable but not extremely outdated, has great security, always supports the newest technologies like Flatpak, Wayland, Pipewire, etc., has good Desktop spins and constantly innovates. The next Fedora KDE release will even completely drop support for X11, which is a good step because it forces developers to adopt Wayland. They also have pretty good immutable spins like Silverblue, Kinoite and others. Other cool distros like Nobara and uBlue are also built on top of Fedora.

        • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Its not really proprietary. Developers get the code, and everyone that gets the binaries also gets the code. Thats GPL compliant.

          • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            To quote Software Freedom Conservancy:

            For approximately twenty years, Red Hat (now a fully owned subsidiary of IBM) has experimented with building a business model for operating system deployment and distribution that looks, feels, and acts like a proprietary one, but nonetheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms.

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              To quote both of you “nevertheless complies with the GPL and other standard copyleft terms”.

              Were you trying to prove his point?

              • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Obviously they comply with the GPL, otherwise they would get sued. But Red Hat acts exactly like a proprietary software company. That’s what the quote is trying to say.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There used to be a Linux just called Red Hat Linux. It was run by Red Hat obviously but a community built up around it.

        Fedora was literally created by RedHat and staffed to be the “community” distro. They did this so that they could be “corporate” with Red Hat Linux ( now called Red Hat Enterprise Linux ).

        I find it funny when people say that Red Hat is going to try to take away the community in Fedora and use their corporate behaviour in RHEL as an example. They literally created them both. The whole point of Fedora is to be community driven.

        Fedora is a lot like RHEL in most ways but absolutely not a competitor to it. More of a testing ground. This is all by design.

        Where things went wrong for them is that somebody created a bug for bug clone of RHEL. The story was that the clone would be a “community” but that is bonkers because ( by definition ) the clone cannot deviate from RHEL. It cannot innovate. It cannot modify or contribute code ( not even fix bugs ). So, it was just a zero cost version of RHEL. The whole reason for creating Fedora was to prevent that.

        Anyway, Red Hat likes Fedora and WANTS it to be “free” and anybody that understands the history knows why.

        In fact, the problem is somewhat that Fedora is not allowed to get too corporate. You will notice that Fedora is one of the staunchest distros with regards to including potentially patented codecs and such for example.

  • xyguy@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is pretty much my setup anyway. I run Pop Shell on top of Fedora and add dash to dock.

    I’m just absolutely hooked on the autotiling built into pop shell.

    If its an official spin all the better.

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      System76 developed its own Desktop, not a modified GNOME anymore. It looks similar, but it is a completely different and novel piece of software.

      • xyguy@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can’t wait. As long as they keep the autotiling feature working as well as it does now I’m down.

  • earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I still don’t understand the need of putting so much time and energy into DE #284838284. I have been using KDE for ages and if I don‘t like the looks of it, I change them. Other than that, 99% of my daily use of a linux is independent of any DE. I actually don’t even care what DE it is. Just give me a Terminal Emulator and a graphical desktop to run software.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think that’s one thing about open source project : a lot of people work for free so they invest time on what they want and like. I don’t know if it’s what happens here, but I think in general it is not fair to ask for an optimal time management in open source communities.

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They like GNOME, obviously, but they also diverge quite a lot from its workflow (not to say to the better, I have only minimal GNOME experience and no Cosmic Epoch experience).

      They want something with their native tiling out of the box, written entirely in Rust. And they are doing something really beneficial here, tbh unlike all the other projects that want to implement their own stuff.

      I agree that we dont need more fragmentation, but Kwin and Mutter are both written in memory unsafe languages, and I have many memory safety errors in KDE.

      For sure a polished KDE plasma 6 is more usable than their alpha, but

      • Rust attracts a ton of young developers
      • it saves a ton of mistakes leading to future bugs

      So while I think I dont really like their type of Desktop (I like KDE but tbh I think I could also change to the GNOME style), I sure hope that KDE will switch to Rust more.

      Problematic is that KDE is completely and entirely tied to Qt, which is C++ and C only pretty much. This makes KDE waaay to stubborn and I honestly dont think they will every change to Rust at all.

      Budgie already thought of using Smithay / Cosmics compositor, but it wasnt ready (I think thats the reason). I think that was a mistake, but its a hard choice.