There’s a good crossover between the best Rugby nations and the best Cricketing nations; I’m assuming this is down to good old fashioned British colonialism?
Which leads me to wonder why Rugby never gained the same level of support in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka as it did in New Zealand, South Africa, Australia and Fiji.
Or am I totally wrong and the two things aren’t remotely related?
You must log in or register to comment.
deleted by creator
Might also explain why Cricket is so popular. Obviously it still requires a fair amount of physical exertion but it’s definitely a bit more laid back than something like Rugby.
deleted by creator
I don’t buy the heat thing.
A) India has all sorts of temperatures, B) they play kabaddi
deleted by creator
This is a good question tbh
deleted by creator
Because it’s a stupid game. Rugby “took off” in places with a significant settler/invader population, which India lacked (relative to the size of the Indian population). Plus, India has its own sports that are far more interesting and then there’s cricket which is a superior game of skill and tact.
Rugby isn’t even popular in the country that birthed the game.
This is an asshat take 🤣🤣. It’s laughable. Nice bait though.
Go back to Reddit
The indian brigade on reddit is wild. If their lies aren’t picked up by others, anything that props up India is flooded to the top and any criticism is considered racism.
One of the benefits of overpopulation on the internet.
Rugby isn’t popular in England? Are you mad?
It’s the third most popular sport, after cricket which most people that I’ve met in the UK have no interest in.
