This question is social/political, and meant to trigger a nice debate on the negatives of imbalanced infinite progressivism we seem to be heading in social and technological spheres, ignoring science, practicality and reason.

Let me put up a disclaimer that I am not trying to poke transgender community here. I am trying to hint towards the “traditional” gender roles that seem to be frowned upon in a cultist manner, even though it is accepted in an unspoken manner that most of us do prefer a lot of “traditional” aspects once we surpass 30s, and life demands responsibility, accountability and maturity.

8values made me think of the fundamental parameters that we gauge ourselves and others on, and this seems like it would have opinions coming from leftists that frown upon traditional values in an almost religious manner, as well as centrists and conservatives that might not have as traditional views as leftists think. Just an open discussion.

We can replace “progressivism” with “liberty” and “nationalism” and create couple more questions, but those are not as debatable I think.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Progressivism is a process for the outcome, whereas economic equality is the ultimate outcome as far as resource (and role) distribution goes. I could be wrong but to me it looks like that, since its all about the class war, and to end class war, capital distribution seems to become the defining target for all things.

    I was trying to look at it from a different lens, one where progressive people tend to irrationally see anything “traditional” as bad. How do we define it? It is a thought poking my head for a while, and is what makes me try and pursue my own path on the leftist spectrum, distancing myself even from capitalists disguised as socdems.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Something isn’t bad if people have genuine consent as to whether they participate in it.

      The very idea of something being traditional though exists precisely to pressure people in to certain ways of doing things. Ways that work for some, but not others.

      Get rid of the pressure, let everyone choose for themselves, and we’re all good

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Alternative perspective: many “traditional” things are in fact bad. Not everything, but many things, and we should dump those things.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        100% agree with that. Now, all we need to do is come to a consensus on what those things are and how to eliminate them with as little “acceptable losses” as possible.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Many are bad, but many are good too. It is all about objectively looking at things, and considering if they are dissociated from the “traditions” we consider bad. This post was made to encourage that.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Tradition effectively holds no weight with me. Is the idea worthwhile? Then why does it matter what people did in the past about it? Is it bad? Then why would I do it?