it has software for the temp control and such

specifically: https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS

I thought it meant sprinkling sugar on them and eating them as an after dinner treat

maybe?, if we accept the mountains of dead human babies the research would inevitably produce.

Not a chance, that has to be mathematically impossible. I can’t see how such a thing wouldn’t break entropy.

Why not both?

in my opinion you are taking a serious breach of personal freedom far too lightly.

“check it out” does not involve handcuffs.

if an Italian died every time “an italian dies” Italy’s population would be in the negatives by now.

it also sees your mouse movements on your way to that box.

I doubt there’s much correlation either way

PFAS are extremely inert, yet they wreak all kinds of havoc in the bodies of humans and animals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per-_and_polyfluoroalkyl_substances

Scientists thought, as you say, that them being chemically inert means they wont be dangerous to living creatures. Sadly they were proven wrong on that.

this is the year of the linux desktop after all

who mentioned a problem?

“No right” to express confusion? Lol.

E10 has an energy density of 108,608 BTU/gal and E15 has an energy density of 106,814 BTU/gal.

source: http://www.airimprovement.com/reports/national-e15-analysis-final.pdf

This gives us tha the 88 octane has 106.8/108.6 ≈ 0.983 times the energy density of the 87.

1-0.983 = 0.017

The correct number is that the 88 needs to be 1.7% cheaper than 87 to give equivalent distance per dollar.

LLMs are fantastic tech, good at many things. Math is not one of those things.

okay so I had AI do the math for me.

“I drove a screw with a hammer”

Airplanes are vehicles, yet it won’t do you much good to take them to a car mechanic.

that reason is not sneakers

I don’t think I want to

1: what the actual fuck did I just read?!

2: yes, babies can eat cooked meat no problem, and commercial baby food often contains it.