Neither. Trip hazard.

Ethically horrible thing to ask. I hope no one answers.

Both are great! Takedown was great with friends infront of the TV, but Paradise had an amazing Online experience.

Don’t make me choooooose!!! (It’s Takedown)

I think in the case of flatpak, they moved them to a different location because they are symlinked within the flatpak itself and should be readonly, where as the other locations are for system desktop files (distro package manager), local desktop files (yours) and optional desktop files (things youve built from source)

Doesn’t seem so bad when you consider that

Copy the unmodified .desktop file to ~/.local/share/Applications and make your changes there.

It’s because Mint used to be Ubuntu without the fuss. Now Ubuntu is Ubuntu without the fuss and mint is Ubuntu with broken packages.

The funny part is that Mint was always just Ubuntu with broken packages.

Edit: I think I hurt some feelings

Do you have any documentation on this by any chance? I don’t really like messing with ad schemas

I thought this stopped working after MS pulled the Unix subsystem, as samba was using those attributes to manage the Linux systems?

Odd, this random github rant didn’t seem to sway my opinion.

To hell with user choice, only flatpak

Yeah the picture looks exactly like my experiences with Manjaro. Thanks

Start by not using Manjaro. Seriously this won’t be the first time this happens to you. It’s not a great distro. Consider EndevourOS if you want Arch without the command line install.