chi-chan~

I saw one commenter suggested Arch itself. IMO it’s even a better idea than EOS.

archinstall doesn’t have GUI, but it has very nice TUI (like what you have when you use htop), and you could finish selecting the options in very few minutes.

If you’re already used to Arch-based systems, and enjoy the convenience of the AUR, what about EndeavourOS?

It’s basically Arch with GUI install scripts, and a different wallpaper.

Not OP, but some of them have non-JS version, in addition to the regular JS version; but yeah, a lot of sites are broken.

OP shared the tools they used, you’ve probably missed it.

- browser - links

- image viewer - fbi

- PDFs - fbpdf

- music - cmus

- movies -mplayer

- e-mail - alpine

- documents - vim, latex

Unless I can’t, Kebab.

No need to hold Shift.

Not to be confused with OpenOffice.

(LibreOffice forked from OO back then.)

OnlyOffice.

No, the fact that it comes with ZSH (OOTB), period.

I think the thing I *adore* in MacOS is the fact that it comes with ZSH preconfigured.

If it’s on the same drive, after updates, Windows will try to ‘fix’ that you have another OS itself, and remove GRUB.

deleted by creator

Install Windows again, then install Linux.

Windows is annoying with it’s bootloader, but when you have separate drive, it would be way smoother experience.

TIL you can do that with udisksctl. How can you do that?

I usually just use dd or Ventoy.

deleted by creator

Like I said in the post on c/archlinux, I had more problems on ‘user-friendly’ distros, than I had on Arch.

deleted by creator

I’d recommend against it, but if you’d *really* want to try something Arch-based, you can try EndeavourOS.

Take something user-friendly, like Linux Mint, or Fedora.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator