• AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    9 months ago

    unlawfully hacking a Nintendo Switch console

    What? It’s my hardware, Apple lost his battle with jailbreaking years ago, Nintendo just shit out an already lost argument.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is not really the same thing.

      The Apple lawsuit was about running unsigned code on the iPhone, which courts deemed that Apple couldn’t use copyright as a tool to enforce its walled garden.

      Nintendo isn’t arguing about people modifying their switch to run homebrew. They’re arguing that to use Yuzu you need to provide it with a copy of the decryption keys and system firmware which must be either extracted from a Switch or distributed illegally.

      This is a much stronger case in Nintendo’s favor, than the Apple jailbreak one. Although, I suspect the Yuzu dev has a better case as it’s already legal to back up discs and ROMs as long as you dont distribute them and they’re not responsible for other people’s actions if they choose to break copyright

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 months ago

        IIRC Sony lost their lawsuit which was almost identical to Nintendo’s. I’m guessing they are hoping for a far friendlier conservative court.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, it’s not.

            The case Sony lost also relied on the end user having a blob of Sony’s code. A user using their own key and a blob of Nintendo’s firmware, which is the official stance of Yuzu on the correct way to do so, is exactly the same thing. There’s nothing new to be litigated. Every part of Yuzu is very clearly legal.

            The fact that it was used to play a game before official release straight up cannot possibly be relevant. It’s a distraction. The project isn’t, and isn’t capable of being, responsible for anything but its own code.

            • acastcandream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Read the article. The cornerstone of their argument is claiming yuzu facilitating/distributing a cracked TOTK before it came out.

              Edit: I misread this, they are not accused of a crack

              • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                By existing. (Yes, that’s the only argument they made. There is no assertion that anyone associated with Yuzu “cracked” (not necessary) or actively distributed TOTK.)

                It’s a distraction. It’s literally impossible for it to be relevant unless the yuzu project page hosted TOTK files.

  • Tetra@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why would anyone play your games on hardware that’s ten years behind? The few Nintendo games I still buy (like Tears of the Kingdom actually) I still play on emulator, because it’s objectively better in every way. Fuck off.

    • freedumb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seeing Tears of the Kingdom actually run in 60 fps on the steamdeck made me immediately sell my Switch. Nintendo are holding back technological development by dragging their feet, and pushing anti-consumer practices.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Seeing Tears of the Kingdom actually run in 60 fps on the steamdeck

        Uhh, you did not see that. It doesn’t even get to 30 in most cases sadly.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    Go multi platform and a large chunk of the people currently pirating Switch games for emulation will just buy your games instead.

  • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ugh, not this again. I’m very adamantly against piracy and I’ve personally dumped every one of my Switch ROMs from games I physically own, but these kinds of stunts make me want to pirate Nintendo games purely out of spite. Hopefully this gets thrown out or otherwise resolved quickly. The issue of clean room emulators has been tested before and found to be fair use and to my knowledge there’s no legal precedent for Nintendo’s claims.

        • acastcandream@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Preservation is noble. Most pirates aren’t doing preservation. You know it, I know it, everyone in this thread knows it. They have a hard drive full of stuff they want to play/watch for free. That’s a far cry from following 3-2-1 protocol, let alone real archive standards. Hence “which they are not doing.”

          Edit: it bears mentioning that I actually don’t begrudge people who pirate necessarily. I just don’t like it when they hide behind real reasons when they aren’t actually doing it for those reasons. It cheapens the endeavor and they’re just straight up lying. If you’re downloading stuff because you want to play for free - which can be because of a lack of access (financial or otherwise) or a myriad of other reasons (perhaps it’s a milestone work but you don’t want to support a piece of shit dev) - then just be honest. But the simple fact is we all know most people pirate because it’s easy and they don’t want to spend money. So let’s stop kidding ourselves when we all know this.

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Preservation is why it’s important to have emulators as soon as someone has figured out how to get one running. Nintendo should be embarrassed that pirating their games often lets these people experience their games better than if the games were run through official channels. I was sure tempted to pirate Metroid Dread instead of buying it, but it wasn’t because I couldn’t afford it, just wanted it for free, or had some notion of retribution toward Nintendo. I was tempted because the Switch is terrible hardware, I prefer to play games on my PC, and it would run better on my PC. I think that was the last Nintendo game I bought. I haven’t pirated any Switch games to date, because the only actual retribution I want toward Nintendo is for both my money and my time to go to games where the companies are less shitty. I’m not going to fault someone for wanting to play Tears of the Kingdom at frame rates higher than 23 FPS and resolutions better than 540p with no anti aliasing, and the best way for Nintendo to cut back on that piracy is to make the game for PC like everyone else is doing these days, but they know the upside of Switch sales is worth more to them than what these pirates cost them. Piracy will also preserve the game better than Nintendo ever will. I honestly don’t care what the percentages are of freeloaders by comparison, because it doesn’t matter.

            EDIT: Oh, btw, I have pirated plenty of their back catalog, and I’m sure you have too. I’d love to buy them, like I bought Sega Genesis games and like I bought old Mega Man games on Steam, but how strange! There’s no legal way to buy those old Nintendo games digitally. You can only rent them in perpetuity. Nah, I’ll just pirate them.

            • acastcandream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Again, there are many reasons I agree with. I just don’t like people behind preservation they aren’t actually doing. I am clearly pro-emulation. Half of my consoles are modded and all my computers have emulators, all of which are loaded with games I definitely purchased and backed up in adherence to all laws pertaining to this issue.

          • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you’re downloading stuff because you want to play for free - which can be because of a lack of access (financial or otherwise) or a myriad of other reasons (perhaps it’s a milestone work but you don’t want to support a piece of shit dev) - then just be honest.

            Why?

              • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                which I explained in the part of my comment you left out.

                Pardon me. Here is the part you left out:

                It cheapens the endeavor

                You’ll forgive me if I can’t seem to scrape enough detail about your argument out of that.

                Piracy fully supports the endeavor of archiving. The motivations of pirates has nothing at all to do with it. Archiving springs from piracy, it is a consequence of piracy. And the corporations you are de-facto acting as defense counsel for here have proven over and over again it means less than nothing to them.

                But I’m making assumptions about your argument, because apparently you think “cheapens the endeavor” is a real mic drop.

                • acastcandream@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Piracy fully supports the endeavor of archiving.

                  It supports it about as much rightwing fuckbois shouting “FREE SPEECH” every time they get in trouble fully supports the first amendment. It’s a dishonest shield by people who want free shit and have no intention of doing anything remotely like archiving/preserving. And as I’ve said before, I don’t care that they want it for free. I just don’t want to hear bullshit excuses.

  • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    As an example I’ve paid for a copy of Breath of Fire 3, 3 times in my life, because the disc broke twice over the years. Now my ps1 & 2 are caput. I still own a copy of the disk. Would it be illegal to download an emulator (I’ve boughten 2 ps1 and 4 ps2 in my lifetime) and a rom of BoF3? Sony got their cut 9 times already.

    If buying isnt owning then pirating isnt stealing in my humble opinion.

    • Link@rentadrunk.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some might argue you would need to copy the ROM from the disc you own instead of downloading it from the internet.

      Luckily for the PS2 this is trivial for anyone with a PC and a disc drive.

  • acastcandream@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Very dumb of them to implicate themselves. Nintendo is ridiculous with this stuff but the yuzu team knew this.