Which one(s) and why?

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Pop!_OS. I previously got stuck on tiling window managers, but I found that they have prohibitively large amounts of setup involved. It’s also not uncommon for support applications to be poorly maintained or to have a poor UX. Pop!_OS’s desktop gathers everything together very nicely into a working shell with minimal setup, but still has that sweet, sweet tiling WM.

    • mac@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This kind of setup works best for me, a desktop environment with a tiling window manager on the top, that way I can use it like a normal desktop for most things and can hop back and forth between apps I use a lot all on the home row with the window manager.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve really liked the flexibility it gives me while leaving behind hassle. Before I had tried XMonad and AwesomeWM with various tray apps for things like wireless networking. I enjoyed using them, but I did not enjoy the amount of work I put into set up. Sure I like tinkering, but there’s a certain level where I just want to have a dependable, working system so I can get on with my day.

        • mac@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Exactly this! I used to enjoy tinkering with my configuration a lot and then it got stressful as I kept finding new things to add or tweak and change and never ended up getting work done.

          I love how simple sway is, even if I’ve added a few extra visual features with the fx version (at least it’s pretty to look at). The configuration is basically set your used apps to keybinds, choose how you want windows to look and be spaced, add a few key bindings.