• Grangle1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Older packages, but not too old, generally provide better stability. Problems can also come from packages being too new and not having all the standout issues worked out of them.

    • Magnolia_@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      around 1 year and a half, thats way too long, considering the Pipewire, OBS, Kernel, Gaming and other drivers updates. Not even mentioning all the updates KDE and Gnome just got in the last 3 months.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I generally would for desktop use, and absolutely wouldn’t rexommend them for a new user.

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Newer kernels are available, they even have a gui for it. Why would a Cinnamon user care about KDE or GNOME updates? (Some of which are broken on Fedora, like rdp login)

        Mint Debian can run 6.7 right now.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Older packages, but not too old, generally provide better stability.

      And worse compatibility. Old packages are a no go for upstream supported hardware like Intel’s and AMD’s.