• harsh3466@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      If only. It’d be a real April fool’s if Canonical announced they were abandoning snap and throwing their supory behind flatpak.

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Having other 180° turnarounds in mind, e.g. Unity, which was nice on a netbook, or their display server (I don’t recall its name), would it be that surprising if this was real news? This makes it a really good April Fool’s joke.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Funny you should mention it:

            “After the initial resistance, some Linux users have started liking Snap, just as few people got attached to Unity. This is a scary situation for us. From Ubuntu One to Unity and Mir, we have abandoned projects in the past. We can do it again for the greater good.”

            Read the article, it’s really fun.

          • intrepid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Their display server is Mir. They first chose Wayland. Everyone was excited and started putting their weight behind it. Then their NIH syndrome kicked in and they declared Mir, claiming that Wayland has a lot of deficiencies. Wayland devs contested it and explained why their complaints were wrong. But Canonical never bothered to reply. This irked everyone else and they stayed with Wayland. Eventually, Mir failed to achieve its goal and Canonical decided to convert it to just another Wayland compositor.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    This thread is full of wonderful workarounds. It reads just like windows forums.

    Just stop using canonicals crap.

    • thayer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      Debian, Fedora, and OpenSUSE all offer excellent alternatives depending on your reasons for staying.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I am on Debian and Pop. However, if they’re dropping the deb distribution, what does that mean for the non Ubuntu folk? Maybe I’ve misunderstood it all?

        • thayer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ubuntu is (mostly) based on Debian. This is simply a move by Ubuntu to further push their own packaging platform which is effectively proprietary at this time. Debian’s own packaging will remain unchanged.

          • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Excellent. Then it doesn’t matter to me at least. Thank you for the reply.

            Still, i don’t trust, nor like the concept of the proprietorial snap system.

            They must be trying to set themselves up to be purchased.

  • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t use Ubuntu but I threw it on a laptop to give to my dad.

    He’s a very basic tech user he basically needed a web browser and somewhere to backup/view his photos off his phone, And even he ran into issue with snaps!

    I tried to switch everything over to flatpak but the OS just kept pushing back trying to reinstall SnapD until I ran some script off Github, It’s the exact “I know better than you” bullshit that pushed me away from Windows.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you really want everything to go on flatpak why not just use Debian + GNOME? No bullshit and you’ll be able to have flathub inside the GNOME software “store”.

      • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I didn’t want to reinstall the whole OS on my Dads laptop since he already has all his stuff on it.

        But I’ll probably go Debian if he ever lets me do it.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Everything is going to snap in Ubuntu. It’s why I don’t use it 🤷
    It even recently made my life very difficult because something I did recently only worked on chromium non-snap, but ubuntu provides no easy way to use the non-snap version. Most frustrating experience on that distro ever. Unfortunately, it can’t be replaced as it’s on a relative’s computer…

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Terry@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I run Ubuntu on my home servers, simply because I always used it, resources and help are plentiful and it’s well documented. I thought.

      Took me a while to realize that after moving to a new machine and upgrading to 22.04 docker was installed as a fucking snap and a bunch of my apps didn’t work because of that. I got it all running now, but every VM and LXC I’ll install going forward will be running Debian instead. Fuck this annoying shit.

      Edit: Or I might try out Mint Mate, since it’s what I know best (aka Ubuntu) without snaps. What would you guys recommend for a basic homelab?

      • leadore@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        You could go for the best of both worlds and use Mint LMDE (Debian Edition). But if only using it as a server, plain Debian should be all you need.

        • Terry@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ooooooo, I didn’t know about that project! I’ll definitely spin up a VM and check LMDE out. Thanks!

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I was sitting next to the laptop’s owner who was in a hurry and already huffing and puffing. Didn’t want to mess up their system by pinning stuff and installing certs or running into issues with “repository not found” issues. In the end, switching to another computer was much faster.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Sickday@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ugh had a similar experience at work related to the chromium package. In our case it had to do with the arm64 build of chromium in an environment that can’t run snaps (docker), so we were pretty much entirely without a solution.

    • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any app that can be sandboxed, should. Especially apps that are parsing random data from the internet.

      • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I stand corrected. All programs should have access to anything, anywhere, and be linked to liblzma just in case if some arbitrary file is compressed. Thank you for setting me straight.

  • lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Who cares?

    Ubuntu is a shell of what it once was. They’re not going to make Snap optional, they need to justify its existence by releasing everything as snaps with no alternative so you have to use it.

    Or, just use Debian if you like Debian-style distros?

    Or, wait for it - this is gonna sound a bit radical but hear me out - give Fedora a try? Flatpak instead and unlike Debian Stable has packages from this century

    Inb4 btw I use Arch

    • KickassWomen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      like Debian Stable has packages from this century

      You can set up Debian 12 to use Flatpak. I use it and it works well.

      • lightnegative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yes, you can sideload apps from this century into Debian and run them in an isolated environment with dependencies also from this century :)

        Tbh I’m surprised that the Debian kernel is new enough to support cgroups /s

  • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Serious question, genuinely curious; Beyond more recent package versions, why do people choose Ubuntu over plain Debian? Debian has been exceptionally stable for me, pushes no proprietary BS, and is as easy to intall and setup as any other distro I’ve used. Plus, for the average computer user, all the packages are recent enough that things should work as expected.

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because it looks nicer and has more polish for desktop. Silent grub, for example.

      • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think looking nicer is very subjectve. I personally prefer default Gnome over Ubuntu’s tweaks. However silent grub makes complete sense. Word vomit every boot does look very hack-ish if you arent used to it.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      because I googled what distro to use and ubuntu was the one I picked randomly and I can’t be fucked to change it

      I assume I am a prototypical user in that regard.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I tried Debian recently (with Cinnamon, since I don’t like Gnome), but I found it was lacking some polish and niceties that I get from Linux Mint. I do use LMDE instead of the Ubuntu base though.

      • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Totally understandable, QOL and creature comforts are important. To be fair, I’m personally the type of user who prefers a spartan system that I can then tailor to my needs, rather than lots of features OOTB. To each their own I suppose.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        My response to that is

        Not Anymore

        In the sense that woth Debian 12, proprietary drivers are included OOTB, so at this point, even that is no longer an argument against Debian.

        • bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I will say this, I have a newer laptop that required manually installing a realtek wifi driver. I’m fine with that, but I know not everyone is, and I know it’s already included in more up to date distros (Arch needed no setup on the same laptop, I’d imagine it’s the same story with Ubuntu being more recent). So I get not wanting to go with Debian, I just used it as a base example of a “purer” OS. I guess Mint might have been a better alternative to use for my specific questiom.

  • Karna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Initially I followed this route to avoid Snap version provided by Ubuntu.

    Later I just downloaded Tar package from Mozilla, and update it manually.

    In short, I just abandoned deb/snap/flatpak altogether.