Hi everyone !

Right now I can’t decide wich one is the most versatile and fit my personal needs, so I’m looking into your personal experience with each one of them, if you mind sharing your experience.

It’s mostly for secure shared volumes containing ebooks and media storage/files on my home network. Adding some security into the mix even tough I actually don’t need it (mostly for learning process).

More precisely how difficult is the NFS configuration with kerberos? Is it actually useful? Never used kerberos and have no idea how it works, so it’s a very much new tech on my side.

I would really apreciate some indepth personal experience and why you would considere one over another !

Thank you !

  • mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    SSHFS will be incredibly slow. I would avoid it personally.

    NFS will be performant and is easy to set up. This being said by default NFS is without any security.

    The problem is that Kerberos is a huge pain to set up. I would avoid this unless you really need Kerberos.

    If you want security NFS + WireGuard will serve you well.

    Also I would consider Samba/CIFS if it is for local convenient fine access. It’s not super secure but for me it’s a good trade off.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is it even possible to use any kind of authentication with NFS other than Kerberos?

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        As a workaround yes. Just do your NFS exports over WireGuard. WireGuard acts as the authentication and encryption.