6·
8 months agoNo because I’m not even sure I have to do that in my country, haven’t looked it up yet.
TL;DR: you can’t have my young liver OP! (yet)
- 1 Post
- 13 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
Cake day: January 8th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
big city with close to zero personal vehicles
6·8 months agoThat is indeed curious. This is the email sent by the very person, so I would believe that first: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4
Not to quote the original security report on you, but
I am not a security researcher, nor a reverse engineer.
It wasn’t a package maintainer, that is true.
In line with Ea Nasir, Artifactually Speaking is a youtube channel run by an archaeologist who works on digs around Ur. In one of his latest videos (the ancient toilet one) he mentions this:
“Sin-nada traveled a lot, but he often wrote letters back home to his wife […]. In the letter […] Sin-Nada asks Nuttuptum ‘why she is angry in her heart’ . It appears Nuttuptum was concerned that her husband was paying too much attention to his work for the temple, and neglecting his family.”
Do you ever spend money on them?
haha yeah that sounds stressful!
It is in the modlog but it was already renamed to
DELETED FOREVER. LOSER
It was kind of like that. They were asking whether copying jpg files and compressing/decompressing them into and out of zips worsened their quality.
I don’t have the post’s text but this was my answer:
As others have pointed out simply copying the file, or compressing it in a zip will never ever change it. It is fundamentally the exact same file. If you load it up in a photo editor (not just viewer), and resave it from there, then it might lose more quality.
Renaming it to png changes essentially nothing about it. Most software will still recognize that it’s a jpg, and open it up as such. If they tried to open it as a png, they would fail. If you load the jpg into a photo editor and save it as png from there then it will actually change formats. But there is no point in doing this. The png’s file size will be much larger, and you can not get any of the quality back that you lost when initially saving it as a jpg.
The post was prior to deletion renamed to:
DELETED FOREVER. LOSER
so that’s cool…
As others have pointed out simply copying the file, or compressing it in a zip will never ever change it. It is fundamentally the exact same file. If you load it up in a photo editor (not just viewer), and resave it from there, then it might lose more quality.
Renaming it to png changes essentially nothing about it. Most software will still recognize that it’s a jpg, and open it up as such. If they tried to open it as a png, they would fail. If you load the jpg into a photo editor and save it as png from there then it will actually change formats. But there is no point in doing this. The png’s file size will be much larger, and you can not get any of the quality back that you lost when initially saving it as a jpg.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Since no one mentioned this: Jerboa simply because it’s FOSS.
Any photo editor will do. Just load it in and export as JPEG or smaller resolution.
On f-droid:
Pocket Paint is crashy for me, but it gets the job done.
Imagepipe has a bit clunky interface but just to load and export it works fine. Its primary advertised purpose is to remove metadata from photos, so not a bad thing to have on hand anyway.