• TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    postmarketOS just gained my respect. To be fair there’s no point in running a Linux system without systemd as you’ll end up installing 32434 different RAM wasting services to handle things like cron, dns, ntp, mounts, sessions, log management etc.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Whether you like Systemd or not, let’s not spread disinformation.

      All these things still exist with Systemd. They are just called Systemd dash something. Also, while Systemd is feature rich, it is pretty heavy relative to many alternatives.

      Distros that avoid Systemd typically do so because they consider it bloated and possibly insecure.

      If you are a fan of Systemd, it is probably because you like the standardization and the integration across previously disparate services. That makes sense. If you think it is making your system faster or lighter, you have not explored the alternatives. Obviously Systemd was a big leap forward in init. Other systems have appeared that also work really well but they are probably too late to matter mainstream. The “market” has spoken and Systemd is the winner.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve yet to find a use-case for “making my system lighter” by exchanging a daemon that takes <0.1% of my total system memory for a bunch of poorly maintained bash scripts.